Bulletin of the Kazan Law Institute of MIA Russia КЮИ МВД России - Эдиторум

maximum length of a script of a manuscript is 20 pages;
preferable word processor is MS Word;
script of a manuscript is Times New Roman, 14 pt, 1.5 line spacing; margins: upper, lower – 2 cm, right – 2,5 cm, left – 1,5 cm;
indention : 1,25 cm, centered;
it is not recommended to use extra spaces, optional hyphen;
italics and semibold should be used for mask tools. It is not recommended to use interspaces and capital composition, underlining;
it is recommended to use Arabic numerals for numbering of tables and illustration;
Latin names of objects should be typed lowercase letters in italics;
manual hyphenation is not allowed;
abstract of the paper in the Russian and English languages containing the title of the paper, full name of an author, the text and key words;
information about an author in the Russian and English languages (full name, degree, academic rank, place of work, legal address of an organization and position, e-mail).

References arrangement

It is important to specify indicate Universal Decimal Classification UDC.

References should respond to the State Standard 7.0.7– 2021 requirements.

References should respond to the State Standard 7.0.7 – 2021 requirements. References are compiled depending on the order of quotation of references in the text (where the number of the reference is in the square brackets). References to the unpublicized research are not allowed. It is important to include in a reference list full names of all authors, titles of papers or books. A reference list indicates a place of publication, a name of the publishing house, a year of publication and the total number of pages (for books); a name of a journal, a year of publication, a volume, an issue of a journal, the pages of the beginning and the ending of a manuscript, DOI (if any). References to the websites “Wikipedia”, “Krugosvet” and encyclopedic resources containing anonymous authorship are not allowed.

Links to the sources (analyzed the materials) are made as subscript links at the bottom of a page.

Ethics of publication

The code of ethics of scientific publications

In accordance with the ethical rules and standards adopted by leading international scientific publishers, the editors adopted the ethical principles, observance of which is obligatory for all participants of the process of scientific publishing – for authors, reviewers, editorial Board members, editorial Board and editor-in-chief.

the Author's ethics

the Authors are obliged to publish only original articles and use the content only of original research. All borrowings from other sources must be decorated accordingly with the obligatory indication of the author and source. Plagiarism in any form, including unregistered quotes, as well as the assignment of rights to the results of other studies are invalid. Threshold of borrowing — not more than 30% of the total volume of the article. Reviews and other articles, for objective reasons requiring a large number of citations are reviewed by the editorial Board individually.

Persons who have not participated in the study as co-authors must not be specified.

the Authors provide for publication of the article must rely on reliable research results. Use and disclosure

deliberately false data is unacceptable.

the Authors submit for publication in the journal of previously published work, as well as the work proposed for publication in other journals.

the Authors attach to article their personal data (place of work, address, place of work, position, e-mail, a photograph), which will be published in the journal.

the Authors agree that their paper will be sent for peer review (reviewer name not disclosed) and you agree to cooperate with the editors to improve, reduce or Supplement its articles in accordance with the reviewers ' comments and to correct these inaccuracies.

In case of errors or inaccuracies in the article, which is under consideration or already published, the authors should promptly notify the journal's editorial Board.

the publication ethics

the Editorial Board is guided in its activities by the provisions of Chapter 70 "Copyright" of the Civil code of the Russian Federation.

are not accepted For publication articles of a political nature that contain biased and incorrect evaluations of other scientific works and other specialists.

When deciding on the admission of article for publication, the editor should evaluate only the content of the article regardless of the race of the author, his gender, sexual orientation, political and religious views, social origin and nationality.

the editorial Board reserves the right to reject a paper without peer review if it is deemed of poor quality or unsuitable for readers of magazines. This decision is made fairly and impartially based on the editorial policy of the journal.

the Editorial Board of the scientific-theoretical journal, taking a decision on publication of the article, is guided by reliability of the data, scientific relevance and scientific novelty of the presented work.

In case of detection of the article elements by copying from other scientific papers (plagiarism) or the fact that the publication authors of the same article in different journals, the editorial Board takes steps to ascertain the reasons for this violation of publication ethics, shall notify that fact to the authors and reserves the right to remove article from publication and will not be allowed to review their articles.

For all claims of the authors, the editors provide detailed and reasoned responses, making every effort to resolve conflicts.

Publication process

Review of manuscripts

License agreement

Articles are accepted for consideration in strict compliance with the requirements to author's original articles and all accompanying documents.

Executive Secretary within 14 days notifies the authors about the receipt of articles via e-mail, check the article for compliance with formal criteria, including checks of original text on the system "Antiplagiat". If necessary, is in correspondence with the authors about the elimination of comments. After the removal of comments sends the articles to chief (research) editor and editorial Board.

the Submitted articles are reviewed by the editorial Board. Initially determine the compliance of the article profile, the concept and scope of the journal. Articles that meet the formal requirements and relevant to the topic are reviewed. In the journal "Vestnik of the Kazan law Institute of MIA of Russia" adopted a "double blind" (the reviewer and the author do not know each other's names) review articles (period of review 1 year). The reviewer on the basis of the analysis the article adopts a decision or to recommend it for publication (without revision or modification), or on its rejection. In case of disagreement of the author with the reviewers ' comments to its reasoned statement considered by the editorial Board. Information about the publication after the authors are informed of review articles, which have been reviewed at the next meeting of the editorial Board.

the Policy of the editorial Board of the journal based on modern legal requirements concerning libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism, supports the Code of ethics of scientific publications made by the Committee on the ethics of scientific publications, and is based on ethical standards of editors and publishers, enshrined in the Code of conduct and guidelines of best practice for the editor and Code of conduct for journal publishers, developed by the Committee on publication ethics (COPE).

is allowed to free reproduction of materials of the journal for personal use and free use for informational, scientific, educational and cultural purposes in accordance with part IV of article 1273 and 1274 Chapter 70 of the Civil code of the Russian Federation. Other types of use are possible only after the conclusion of appropriate written agreements with the copyright holder.

Electronic versions of the articles are available on this website.

the Paper version of the journal is distributed by subscription.

The process of articles reviewing

Ethics of peer review

In accordance with the Journal politics the Editors Office established the procedure of review of the manuscripts presented to the publication. Submitted manuscripts receive a review of at least one reviewer included in the list of the main specialists of the definite research area.

The reviewers render their reviews in the Editors Office within 1 or 2 weeks from the date of sending the manuscripts for reviewing.

Reviewing is anonymous. Authors are unaware of the names of their reviewers. This technique is called double-blind review. However the name of the reviewer may be given to the author of the manuscript at the request of the reviewer and with a written consent.

The reviewers should strive towards maximum objectivity. The only criterion in estimating manuscripts is their scientific value. Personal preferences are not allowed. In case of conflict of interest between a reviewer and an author, a reviewer must inform the Editorial Board of the Journal s and cancel a review.

Unpublished data from the manuscript submitted for consideration shall not be used by reviewers for private purposes.

The reviewer who does not possess, in his view, competency in reviewing manuscripts or is not objective should inform the editor about it and request a manuscript to be removed from the process of reviewing.

A review gives the analysis of the compliance of the paper with the requirements of the Journal on subject and length of a paper, academic novelty, literacy, clarity, credibility of measurement data and references.

Reviewers should avoid conflict of interest towards the authors of the manuscripts or the company which has financed the research.

The result of the review is a decision on the chance of its publication as presented, reworked, after the general rework (with reconsideration) or its cancel. This result is approved by the Editorial Board of the Journal.

Based on the result of the editorial review the review of the paper is sent to the author including required elaborating and time frames within which the process of rework has to be finished.

Article retraction process

Retraction

2016
the a Review of press articles Fazlieva L. K. using the results of the forensic examination of substances, materials and products in the investigation of crimes // Bulletin of the Kazan law Institute of MIA Russia. 2016. No. 2. P. 93-98.

the Article published in the scientific-theoretical journal "Vestnik of the Kazan law Institute of MIA of Russia" (2016, No. 2. P. 93-98), entitled "using the results of the forensic examination of substances, materials and products in the investigation of crimes", authored Fazlieva Lily Cantelon, withdrawn from print by the editor with the consent of the publisher.

the Withdrawal (retraction) of the publication due to the identification of a significant part of large-scale borrowing from the following sources: Forensic investigation of materials, substances and products : textbook / E. V. Sysoev, A. V. Seleznev, E. V. Burtseva, I. P. Cancer. Tambov : Publishing house Tamb. GOS. tehn. University press, 2007. S. 84; A. V. Khmeleva Tactical features of appointment of legal expertise // forensic Expert. 2014. No. 4. P. 12-15.