Introduction: the paper considers the legal forms of the restoration of civil rights violated by the crime on the basis of a comprehensive study, assessment and generalization of the criminal procedural, civil and civil procedural legislation. Also on the basis of the study conducted by the authors and summarizing the law enforcement practice on the realization of compensation for harm caused to the victim by the crime, the analysis of its current state is given and some recommendations for improving the provisions ensuring the property protection of victim’s rights are made. Primarily the study is aimed at determining the optimal forms of restoration of civil rights violated by the crime, which can influence the improvementof the effectiveness of law enforcement agencies in protecting the legal rights and interests of individuals. Materials and Methods: the empirical basis of the study was the reviews of the activities of federal courts of general jurisdiction and magistrates; official statistics of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation, as well as data obtained as a result of a sociological survey of different groups of respondents determined by a quota representative sample. General scientific methods of expertise of objective reality (analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction), private-science methods (questioning, interviewing) and special-legal methods (comparative law) were used. Results: as a result of the analysis, the authors concluded that there is a need for more strict control by both heads of departments and supervisory bodies of persons holding inquests and preliminary investigations regarding compliance with provisions ensuring the property protection of the victim’s rights from crime provided for both by the Constitution of the Russian Federation and by the norms of civil legislation. On the basis of the data obtained, the authors presented recommendations on improving the effectiveness of organizational and legal forms for the implementation of tort liabilities in the activities of law enforcement bodies. Discussion and Conclusions: an analysis of the current state of legislation shows the need for a clear definition of possible forms (ways) for compensation for harm caused by crime in the Russian Federation Code of Criminal Procedure.
zaschita sub'ektivnyh prav, formy vosstanovleniya grazhdanskih prav, yuridicheskaya otvetstvennost', grazhdansko-pravovaya otvetstvennost', vozmeschenie vreda (uscherba), ugolovnyy process
1. Vardanyan S.G. Opredelenie suti restitucii v ugolovnom processe Rossii // Vestnik Volzhskogo universiteta im. V.N. Tatischeva. 2017. № 1. T. 2. S. 118 - 119.
2. Karabanova E.N., Parfenova M.V. Pravo poterpevshego na vozmeschenie vreda, prichinennogo prestupleniem // Vestnik Akademii General'noy prokuratury Rossiyskoy Federacii. 2014. № 2 (40). S. 87 - 92.
3. Kozackaya V.E. Grazhdansko-pravovaya otvetstvennost' za vred, prichinennyy prestupleniem: dis.. kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2011. 235 s.
4. Os'kina I., Luau A. Grazhdanskiy isk v ugolovnom processe // EZh-Yurist. 2014. № 11. S. 4 - 5.
5. Selednikova O.N. Restituciya kak forma realizacii konstitucionnogo prava grazhdan na vozmeschenie imuschestvennogo vreda, prichinennogo prestupleniem // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. 2014. № 10. C. 109 - 115.
6. Suprun S.V. Sposoby vozmescheniya vreda, prichinennogo prestupleniem // Mirovoy sud'ya. 2009. № 12. C. 22-26.
7. Yunoshev S.V. Otraslevaya prinadlezhnost' instituta vozmescheniya vreda, prichinennogo prestupleniem // LexRussica. 2014.T. XCVI. № 8.C. 920-927. References
8. Vardanyan S.G. Opredelenie suti restitucii v ugolovnom processe Rossii // Vestnik Volzhskogo universiteta im. V.N. Tatishcheva. 2017. T. № 1.T. 2. S. 118-119.
9. Karabanova E.N., Parfenova M.V. Pravo poterpevshego na vozmeshchenie vreda, prichinennogo prestupleniem // Vestnik Akademii General’noj prokuratury Rossijskoj Federacii. 2014. № 2 (40). S. 87 - 92.
10. Kozackaya V.EH. Grazhdansko-pravovaya otvetstvennost’ za vred, prichinennyj prestupleniem :dis.. kand. yurid. nauk. Moskva, 2011. 235 s.
11. Os’kina I., Luau A. Grazhdanskij isk v ugolovnom processe // EHZH-YUrist. 2014. № 11. S. 4 - 5.
12. Selednikova O.N. Restituciya kak forma realizacii konstitucionnogo prava grazhdan na vozmeshchenie imushchestvennogo vreda, prichinyonnogo prestupleniem // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. 2014. № 10.C. 109-115.
13. Suprun S.V. Sposoby vozmeshcheniya vreda, prichinennogo prestupleniem // Mirovoj sud’ya. 2009. № 12. C. 22-26.
14. Ynoshev S.V. Otraslevaya prinadlezhnost’ instituta vozmeshcheniya vreda, prichinennogo prestupleniem // LexRussica. 2014. T. XCVI. № 8. C. 920-927.
