Introduction: the article discusses features of compensation of damage in a different way as a cause for promoting with court fine. Materials and Methods: the methodological basis of the study is a combination of general scientific and particular scientific methods of cognition: dialectical, dogmatic, semantic, formal logical, methods of analysis and synthesis. The materials were current criminal and criminal procedure laws, use of norms of release from liability, the draft of the Federal Law dated October 31, 2017 “On amendments to the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation and Criminal Procedural Code of the Russian Federation due to the introduction of the concept of criminal offence” legal texts. Results: proposals were formulated to bring the name of the norm in line with the traditions of presentation of incentive norms of chapter 11 of the Criminal Code. Proposals were made to clarify the content of the appeal to positive post-criminal behavior in the form of mitigating criminal harm caused to the interests of society and the state. Discussion and Conclusions: challenges were identified in consideration of the issue of the possibility of release of guilty with the appointment of a judicial fine in law enforcement practice. The necessity of clarifying the provisions of the paragraph 2.1. of the resolutions of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation of June 27, 2013 N 19 “On the application by courts of legislation regulating the grounds and procedure for exemption from criminal liability” as well as the revision of the title of Article 76.2. of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation.
pooschrenie, model' povedeniya, prizyv, zaglazhivanie vreda, sudebnyy shtraf
1. Golovko L.V. Zakonoproekt ob ugolovnom prostupke: mnimye smysly i real'naya podopleka // Zakon. 2018. № 1.
2. Zvecharovskiy I.E. O yuridicheskoy prirode sudebnogo shtrafa (st. st. 76.2, 104.4 UK RF) // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2016. № 6. S. 98 - 101.
3. Golovko L.V. Mozhno privetstvovat' nashih sudey, kotorye ne hotyat uproscheniya pravosudiya // Ugolovnyy process. 2017. № 1. S. 38 - 45.
4. Anoschenkova S.V. Naznachenie sudebnogo shtrafa: voprosy teorii i praktiki // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2017. № 7.
5. Smirnova E.V. Pravovoe regulirovanie i voprosy praktiki vozmescheniya vreda, prichinennogo prestupleniem, v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve Rossii: dis.. kand. yurid. nauk. Volgograd, 2017. S. 68.
6. Trofimov G.A. Sudebnyy shtraf - al'ternativa? // Rossiyskiy sud'ya. 2017. № 8.
7. Reshetnyak V.I. Sudebnyy shtraf v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve // Sud'ya. 2017. № 4.
8. Skripchenko N.Yu. Sudebnyy shtraf: problemy realizacii zakonodatel'nyh novell // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2017. № 7.
9. Vdovin V.A. Prekraschenie ugolovnogo presledovaniya s naznacheniem mery ugolovno-pravovogo haraktera po ugolovnym delam, v kotoryh otsutstvuet vozmozhnost' zaglazhivaniya vreda // Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika. 2018. № 6.
10. Tarhanov I.A. Pooschrenie pozitivnogo povedeniya v ugolovnom prave: monografiya. Kazan': Izd-vo KGU, 2001. S. 124.
