Introduction: the article deals with key aspects of the differentiation of procedural forms of criminal proceedings. The focus is on the current state, challenges and perspectives to improve preliminary investigation process forms. Materials and Methods: the methodological base of the given research are said to be a dialectical method of scientific knowledge, historical, logical, comparative legal, statistical, concrete sociological methods as well as methods of observation and other particular methods of research of legal phenomena. Results: the differentiation of the forms of criminal proceedings being an initially theoretical matter is of great importance for efficient implementation of criminal prosecution and solution of the criminal procedure tasks at all its stages. Since the Code of Criminal Procedure has been adopted and up to nowadays the legislator making attempts to differentiate the forms of pre-trial proceedings does not fully take into account the scientific experience in this field and the needs of practice that lead to disappointing results. Differentiated procedural forms of investigation do not meet the requirements to solve quickly and efficiently the criminal procedure tasks. Discussion and Conclusions: the authors based on the study of the grounds, goals and objectives of the differentiation of pre-trial proceedings as well as the results of the use of existing forms conclude about the unequivocal necessity to modernize a current preliminary investigation taking into account the “work on the mistakes” made by the legislator in legal regulation during the period of validity of the Code of Criminal Procedure of 2001.
differenciaciya, dosudebnoe proizvodstvo, formy predvaritel'nogo rassledovaniya, predvaritel'noe rassledovanie, sokraschennoe doznanie, protokol'naya forma dosudebnogo proizvodstva
1. Gavrilov B.Ya. Protokol'naya forma dosudebnogo proizvodstva - genezis, sovremennoe sostoyanie, perspektivy razvitiya // Vestnik ekonomicheskoy bezopasnosti. 2016. № 5. S. 12-18.
2. Strogovich M.S. O edinoy forme ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva i predelah ee differenciacii // Socialisticheskaya zakonnost'. 1974. № 9. S. 52-56.
3. Petruhin I.L. Ob uproschennoy (protokol'noy) forme rassledovaniya prestupleniy // Problemy pravosudiya i ugolovnogo prava. M., 1978. S. 50-61.
4. Shadrin V.S. Suschnost' dosudebnogo proizvodstva i dal'neyshee razvitie ego form v sovetskom ugolovnom processe // Formy dosudebnogo proizvodstva i ih sovershenstvovanie. Volgograd, 1989. S. 4-16.
5. Yakimovich Yu.K., Lenskiy A.V., Trubnikova T.V. Differenciaciya ugolovnogo processa. Tomsk: Izd-vo Tom. un-ta. 2001. 280 s.
6. Kruglikov A.P. Dopolnenie UPK RF novoy Glavoy o doznanii v sokraschennoy forme i nekotorye problemy differenciacii ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva // Rossiyskaya yusticiya. 2013. № 12. S. 45-50.
7. Gavrilov B.Ya., Milehin V.A. Perspektivy sovershenstvovaniya form rassledovaniya prestupleniy podsledstvennyh organam doznaniya sistemy MVD Rossii // Vestnik ekonomicheskoy bezopasnosti. 2018. № 2. S. 92-96.
8. Yakimovich Yu.K. Problemy i perspektivy differenciacii ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva // Ugolovnaya yusticiya. 2015. № 2 (6). S. 63-66.
9. Yakub M.L. Processual'naya forma v sovetskom ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve. M., 1981. 144 s.
10. Kachalova O.V. Uskorennoe proizvodstvo v rossiyskom ugolovnom processe: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk: 12.00.09. M., 2016. 55 s.
11. Skobkareva E.A. Uproschennaya forma dosudebnogo proizvodstva po ugolovnomu delu: voprosy teorii, zakonodatel'stva i praktiki: dis.. kand. yurid. nauk: 12.00.09. Volgograd, 2018. 250 s.
12. Gorkina E.V. Processual'nye i organizacionnye aspekty proizvodstva doznaniya organami vnutrennih del: dis.. kand. yurid. nauk: 12.00.09. Volgograd, 2006. 225 s.
13. Velikiy D.P. Edinstvo i differenciaciya ugolovno-processual'noy formy: istoriya, sovremennost', perspektivy: avtoref. dis. …kand. yurid. nauk : 12.00.09. M., 2001. 28 s.
14. Maslenkov S.L. Doznanie v sovremennom ugolovnom processe Rossii: problemy sovershenstvovaniya: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. N. Novgorod, 2004. 198 s.
15. Mit'kova Yu.S. Voprosy obespecheniya prav uchastnikov ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva pri proizvodstve doznaniya v sokraschennoy forme // Vestnik Nizhegorodskoy akademii MVD Rossii. 2014. № 2 (26). S.238-241.
16. Sokol P.Ya. Processual'nye garantii bystroty predvaritel'nogo rassledovaniya : avtoref. dis. …kand. yurid. nauk: 12.00.09. M., 1990. 32 s.
