Introduction: the article is devoted to the analysis of simplified production in the civil process. In the author's opinion, the simplified production institute needs to be reformed in connection with existing law enforcement problems. Materials and Methods: the methodological basis of the study is the conceptual provisions of the general scientific dialectical method of cognizing the phenomena of objective reality, as well as private-scientific methods: formal-legal, comparative-legal, statistical. Results: the article analyzes in detail the application of the simplified procedure for civil cases, through the prism of the position of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation; on the basis of the generalization of statistical data, the low efficiency of the implementation of the simplified procedure in civil cases in judicial practice is revealed. The analysis makes it possible to conclude that the insufficient elaboration of the simplified production institute, as well as the lack of uniformity in interpreting the rules governing a simplified procedure for dealing with cases, requires justification for a number of changes in legislation. In particular, the author proposes to supplement Part 1 of Art. 232.2 of the Code of Civil Procedure of the Russian Federation, paragraph 4. Discussion and Conclusions: comparison of the different points of view of theorists and practitioners in the sphere of civilization on the issue of reforming the institute of simplified production gives grounds to argue that the development of the institute of simplified proceedings in civil cases is connected with the expansion of the list of cases to be considered in a simplified procedure, and therefore it is proposed to formulate a uniform approach in matters interpretation of the rules governing a simplified procedure for dealing with cases.
uproschennoe proizvodstvo, grazhdanskoe sudoproizvodstvo, vyzov storon, reformirovanie instituta uproschennogo proizvodstva
1. Problemy razvitiya processual'nogo prava Rossii: monografiya / A. V. Belyakova, L. A. Voskobitova, A. V. Gabov [i dr.]; pod red. V. M. Zhuykova. M.: Norma, Infra-M, 2016.
2. Bolovnev M.A. Uproschennoe proizvodstvo kak sredstvo protivodeystviya zloupotrebleniyam processual'nymi pravami // Sovremennoe pravo. 2017. № 10. S. 110 - 112.
3. Borisova E.A. Uproschennoe proizvodstvo v grazhdanskom sudoproizvodstve: mezhdunarodno-pravovye standarty, zarubezhnyy i rossiyskiy opyt // Zakon. 2017. № 7. S. 78 - 86.
4. Borisova E.A. Apellyacionnoe obzhalovanie resheniya po delu, rassmatrivaemomu v poryadke uproschennogo proizvodstva // Vestnik ekonomicheskogo pravosudiya Rossiyskoy Federacii. 2017. № 3. S. 76 - 86.
5. Bortnikova N.A. Uproschennye sudebnye proizvodstva // Rossiyskiy sud'ya. 2017. № 2. S. 22 - 27.
6. Yakusheva N.E. Differenciaciya polnomochiy suda apellyacionnoy instancii v uproschennom proizvodstve v zavisimosti ot defektov sudebnyh aktov sudov pervoy instancii // Administrator suda. 2017. № 3. S. 41 - 44.
7. Savinov K.A. Uproschennoe proizvodstvo kak forma osuschestvleniya pravosudiya po grazhdanskim delam: problemy i perspektivy razvitiya // Arbitrazhnyy i grazhdanskiy process. 2017. № 1. S. 50 - 54.
8. Smagina E.S. Problemy uproschennogo proizvodstva v grazhdanskom processe // Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika. 2016. № 9. S. 57 - 63.
9. Tabak I.A. Vliyanie nekotoryh osobennostey poryadka uproschennogo proizvodstva na soblyudenie processual'nyh srokov rassmotreniya i razresheniya dela sudami obschey yurisdikcii // Arbitrazhnyy i grazhdanskiy process. 2017. № 9. S. 24 - 28.
10. Malyshkin A.V. Kategorii del, podlezhaschih rassmotreniyu v poryadke uproschennogo proizvodstva: integrirovanie prikaznoy i obscheiskovoy yurisdikcii // Vestnik grazhdanskogo processa. 2017. № 4. S. 234 - 246.
11. Timofeev Yu.A. Processual'nye sredstva optimizacii v uproschennom proizvodstve // Arbitrazhnyy i grazhdanskiy process. 2017. № 11. S. 21 - 25.
12. Slepchenko E.V. Grazhdanskoe sudoproizvodstvo. Problemy edinstva i differenciacii. M.: Izdatel'stvo R. Aslanova «Yuridicheskiy centr Press», 2016. - 504 c.
13. Uproschennoe proizvodstvo v grazhdanskom processe: nauchno-prakticheskoe posobie / A.V. Malyshkin, S.V. Rogozhin, A.E. Bochkarev i dr. M.: Prospekt, 2017. - 48 s.
14. Nikulinskaya N.F. Kommentariy k glave 21.1 «Uproschennoe proizvodstvo» Grazhdanskogo processual'nogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federacii ot 14 noyabrya 2002 g. № 138-FZ (postateynyy) // SPS Konsul'tantPlyus. 2017.
15. Bespalov Yu.F., Egorova O.A. Kommentariy k Grazhdanskomu processual'nomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federacii / pod red. Yu.F. Bespalova. M., 2017.
16. Masaladzhiu R.M. Uproschennoe proizvodstvo v grazhdanskom i arbitrazhnom processah: vse li sdelano pravil'no? // Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika. 2017. № 9. S. 36 - 41.
17. Chistova K. VS RF ob uproschennom proizvodstve // EZh-Yurist. 2017. № 21. S. 3.
