Introduction: the article explores the concepts and types of strengthening and aggravation of other criminal law measures. Materials and Methods: logical, system and structural, statistical methods were used in the work. The research is based on the norms of criminal legislation of the Russian Federation (Articles 73, 74, 79, 82, 82/1, 81, 90, 92, 98, 104.2 the Criminal Code of Russian Federation) and foreign countries, the provisions of the resolutions of the Plenum of the Supreme Court, scientific literature. Results: the article proposes the author's systematization of other criminal law measures taking into account the latest changes in criminal and correctional legislation of the Russian Federation. The concept of strengthening and aggravation of other criminal law measures is defined. On the basis of the analysis of the considered norms, two groups of other criminal law measures are identified: 1) measures in respect of which strengthening and aggravation are possible; 2) measures in respect of which strengthening or aggravation is not applied. Ways of strengthening of punitive potential concerning some measures of criminal character are considered. Discussion and Conclusions: to improve the norms providing for other criminal measures, they should be systematized, as implemented by the legislator with regard to the types of punishments, as well as to specify the goals of each of them. The Court was granted the right to supplement the previously defined duties (Part 7 of Article 73 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation). When is it possible? Compulsory educational measures are partially similar to summary probation. However, failure in duties under summary probation entails strengthening this measure, up to its abolition. If the convicted evades staying in a specialized custodial institution, court restorates the period of sentence, but this isn’t always possible. The issue of aggravation when serving a delay under Art. 82 of the Criminal Code is also discussed.